Jens 'n' Frens
Idle thoughts of a relatively libertarian Republican in Cambridge, MA, and whomever he invites. Mostly political.

"A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures."
  -- Daniel Webster



Friday, January 11, 2008 :::
 

I'm not sure much of anything will necessarily be known in the Republican Presidential race before late February 5, but Rudy's strategy of waiting to win a state after three or four other candidates have made themselves more viable than him doesn't seem like a great idea. If there were only two or three candidates going into January 29 there might be a niche for him to exploit — and I think, in fact, that he was hoping for at least two candidates to split the vote that finds him too liberal, but he's taken it to the point where every point in his favor is something someone more viable has at least as well as he does, and it requires exquisite balancing of priorities to choose him on executive experience, ability to appeal to independents, and general SOB-ness.

Thompson has the same problem, though perhaps less so; the niche he's fighting for is a little wider. It's just a bit late to become the fourth viable candidate and, though I think a lot of Republican voters would choose him over the other three, he's created something of a coordination problem for them.

McCain has a problem with what I very recently saw very aptly described as "self-righteousness", which is perhaps a bit the flip side of the SOB-ness that sometimes attracts people to him and to Rudy. I recently saw the complaint, probably on the Corner, that his response to fiscal conservatism is always stronger on spending than on taxes; I guess that's the side I care more about, so I'm supportive of him on that. I take a certain amount of my recently-found peace with him from the support of Phil Gramm; I kind of hope that, if he got into office, any nutty impluse against, e.g., pharmaceutical companies would be held in check by some economically-literate advisors.

For similar reasons, on the Democratic side, I find myself supporting Austan Goolsbee — er, I mean Barack Obama, at least on the domestic front. I imagine whatever he ended up proposing would at least be somehow technically right in ways that I don't expect from Hillary Clinton. I'm still worried about his instincts, though.

I don't think he's an empty suit; he just plays one on TV.


::: posted by dWj at 7:46 PM


Comments: Post a Comment







Comment Policy
_______________

Dollars and Jens
Dean's Antipopulist.com
Steven's web-site


Kitchen Cabinet
Colby Cosh
Instapundit
The Volokh Conspiracy
The Corner
The Bleat from James Lileks
Beldar
Tim Blair
Daily Ablution
RealClearPolitics
Mickey Kaus
Dave Barry
How Appealing
Virginia Postrel
Becker-Posner
Reason's "Hit and Run"
Discriminations
Captain's Quarters
Roger L. Simon
Hewitt
Power Line
IWF's InkWell
Blogs for Bush
Chetly Zarko
Signifying Nothing
 
Massachusetts
Cosmo Macero
Hub Blog
Ex Parte from Harvard Law's Federalists
Harvard CR blog
Priorities & Frivolities
Daley News
Emil Levitin
Politica Obscura
Wave Maker
Town Watch
Worcester County Repubs

 
Election '08
Don't Vote
Dave Barry
John McCain

 
Other Sites of Note
Townhall columnists Cambridge Republican City Committee
Cambridge Chronicle
Robert Winters
Boston Herald
Boston Globe
Boston Metro
Channel 5
Commonwealth Mag
Fox News
Massachusetts Republican Assembly
Robert Benchley Society

Reference
U.S. Constitution
9/11 commission report [7 Meg PDF]
Iraq Survey Group report
Fahrenheight 9/11 deceits


_______________

Idle thoughts of a relatively libertarian Republican in Cambridge, MA, and whomever he invites. Mostly political.


Powered by Blogger