Jens 'n' Frens
Idle thoughts of a relatively libertarian Republican in Cambridge, MA, and whomever he invites. Mostly political.

"A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures."
  -- Daniel Webster



Wednesday, March 03, 2004 :::
 

Perhaps I should refrain from gay marriage comments until I've read the Russian novel Eric wrote late last week (against) and the email my sister sent me late last week (for), neither of which I've more than skimmed. But I basically agree with Lily's comments that slippery slope arguments from the right are overblown (I think slippery slope arguments from the left, regarding the FMA, are also overblown, but that's a different question). I don't think this (quite, at least) equates with the civil rights movement -- differences of sex are more substantial than differences of race, and the "civil disobedience" is largely being conducted by government officials. I do wish to comment on this:
The vast majority of marriages will be between a man and a woman. (The divorce rate will remain at around fifty percent, as homosexuals will prove no better at living up to their vows than heterosexuals have been lately.)
I don't know whether homosexual marriages will be more or less successful than the recent heterosexual kind, but I agree that it won't affect the divorce rate much, because they will be such a small fraction of the marriages.

Incidentally, I can't be the only one who's astonished by this:
West and his attorneys have said that New York law is gender-neutral and that he has the authority to solemnize marriages without a license.

Pataki, however, insisted again Tuesday that the state's marriage law is clear. "Marriage is between a man and a woman, and as public officials we should enforce that law," Pataki said.
Is New York state law really so ambiguous that each side can make their argument with a straight face? Or is it presumptuous of me to assume that the reporter would have mentioned it if one of them hadn't had a straight face? Or am I just naive? I'm really not thrilled to be hoping that I'm naive.

On a mostly unrelated matter, did somebody cover the Troggs' "Love Is All Around"? I hadn't heard. I have heard Eric Clapton's version of "While My Guitar Gently Weeps", and I'm a fan of it.


::: posted by Steven at 1:17 AM


Comments: Post a Comment







Comment Policy
_______________

Dollars and Jens
Dean's Antipopulist.com
Steven's web-site


Kitchen Cabinet
Colby Cosh
Instapundit
The Volokh Conspiracy
The Corner
The Bleat from James Lileks
Beldar
Tim Blair
Daily Ablution
RealClearPolitics
Mickey Kaus
Dave Barry
How Appealing
Virginia Postrel
Becker-Posner
Reason's "Hit and Run"
Discriminations
Captain's Quarters
Roger L. Simon
Hewitt
Power Line
IWF's InkWell
Blogs for Bush
Chetly Zarko
Signifying Nothing
 
Massachusetts
Cosmo Macero
Hub Blog
Ex Parte from Harvard Law's Federalists
Harvard CR blog
Priorities & Frivolities
Daley News
Emil Levitin
Politica Obscura
Wave Maker
Town Watch
Worcester County Repubs

 
Election '08
Don't Vote
Dave Barry
John McCain

 
Other Sites of Note
Townhall columnists Cambridge Republican City Committee
Cambridge Chronicle
Robert Winters
Boston Herald
Boston Globe
Boston Metro
Channel 5
Commonwealth Mag
Fox News
Massachusetts Republican Assembly
Robert Benchley Society

Reference
U.S. Constitution
9/11 commission report [7 Meg PDF]
Iraq Survey Group report
Fahrenheight 9/11 deceits


_______________

Idle thoughts of a relatively libertarian Republican in Cambridge, MA, and whomever he invites. Mostly political.


Powered by Blogger