|
|
|
|
|
Jens 'n' Frens
Idle thoughts of a relatively libertarian Republican in Cambridge, MA, and whomever he invites. Mostly political.
"A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures." -- Daniel Webster
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, March 03, 2004 :::
Perhaps I should refrain from gay marriage comments until I've read the Russian novel Eric wrote late last week (against) and the email my sister sent me late last week (for), neither of which I've more than skimmed. But I basically agree with Lily's comments that slippery slope arguments from the right are overblown (I think slippery slope arguments from the left, regarding the FMA, are also overblown, but that's a different question). I don't think this (quite, at least) equates with the civil rights movement -- differences of sex are more substantial than differences of race, and the "civil disobedience" is largely being conducted by government officials. I do wish to comment on this:The vast majority of marriages will be between a man and a woman. (The divorce rate will remain at around fifty percent, as homosexuals will prove no better at living up to their vows than heterosexuals have been lately.) I don't know whether homosexual marriages will be more or less successful than the recent heterosexual kind, but I agree that it won't affect the divorce rate much, because they will be such a small fraction of the marriages.
Incidentally, I can't be the only one who's astonished by this:West and his attorneys have said that New York law is gender-neutral and that he has the authority to solemnize marriages without a license.
Pataki, however, insisted again Tuesday that the state's marriage law is clear. "Marriage is between a man and a woman, and as public officials we should enforce that law," Pataki said. Is New York state law really so ambiguous that each side can make their argument with a straight face? Or is it presumptuous of me to assume that the reporter would have mentioned it if one of them hadn't had a straight face? Or am I just naive? I'm really not thrilled to be hoping that I'm naive.
On a mostly unrelated matter, did somebody cover the Troggs' "Love Is All Around"? I hadn't heard. I have heard Eric Clapton's version of "While My Guitar Gently Weeps", and I'm a fan of it.
::: posted by Steven at 1:17 AM
|
|
|
|