Jens 'n' Frens
Idle thoughts of a relatively libertarian Republican in Cambridge, MA, and whomever he invites. Mostly political.

"A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures."
  -- Daniel Webster



Friday, August 15, 2003 :::
 

It's time for a waste-of-bandwidth post, don't you think?

Through much of the past decade of my life, laundry has required quarters. I'm thus in quarter-acquisition mode; if something costs $6.30, I offer $7.05 if I have it, receiving 3 quarters in change. For the past year, though, I've not needed quarters for laundry; I have needed coins for tolls. Most of the tolls I pay are 40 cents; quarter, nickel, dime. If you pay for everything in dollar bills, on the average transaction, supposing the amount due has a mantissa randomly distributed with an equal probability of 1% for each possible number of cents, you'll receive 1.5 quarters, .8 dimes, and .4 nickels (plus 2 pennies). Thus nickels, the bulky, cheap cousin to the penny in terms of its nuisance-to-value ratio, are the hardest to acquire; one has to conciously acquire nickels.

What I properly ought to acquire is probably the automatic toll-paying doohickey that lets me go through tollbooths at 30mph while it charges my account, but what is of more interest to me is the fact that the value of a nickel to me is not exactly one fifth the value of a quarter; it's now slightly higher, while before it was slightly lower. Certainly the value ratio is constrained by the fact that there are a number of market-makers out there willing to accept quarters and pay out nickels, or vice versa, in a fixed ratio; there are change machines that will only give, say, 95 cents in coins for a paper dollar, but those have never really taken off, probably in part for cultural reasons. I think it would be interesting, though, if the Federal Reserve and the U.S. mint took their signals from market prices; a couple years back, when there was a penny shortage in New York, the mint might (in a particular theoretical world) have noticed that the value of a penny, relative to a basket of other coins and bills, was a few percent higher than 1 cent before it ever got to be newsworthy, and could have cranked up the output as best as possible to avert the problem.



::: posted by dWj at 3:01 PM


Comments: Post a Comment







Comment Policy
_______________

Dollars and Jens
Dean's Antipopulist.com
Steven's web-site


Kitchen Cabinet
Colby Cosh
Instapundit
The Volokh Conspiracy
The Corner
The Bleat from James Lileks
Beldar
Tim Blair
Daily Ablution
RealClearPolitics
Mickey Kaus
Dave Barry
How Appealing
Virginia Postrel
Becker-Posner
Reason's "Hit and Run"
Discriminations
Captain's Quarters
Roger L. Simon
Hewitt
Power Line
IWF's InkWell
Blogs for Bush
Chetly Zarko
Signifying Nothing
 
Massachusetts
Cosmo Macero
Hub Blog
Ex Parte from Harvard Law's Federalists
Harvard CR blog
Priorities & Frivolities
Daley News
Emil Levitin
Politica Obscura
Wave Maker
Town Watch
Worcester County Repubs

 
Election '08
Don't Vote
Dave Barry
John McCain

 
Other Sites of Note
Townhall columnists Cambridge Republican City Committee
Cambridge Chronicle
Robert Winters
Boston Herald
Boston Globe
Boston Metro
Channel 5
Commonwealth Mag
Fox News
Massachusetts Republican Assembly
Robert Benchley Society

Reference
U.S. Constitution
9/11 commission report [7 Meg PDF]
Iraq Survey Group report
Fahrenheight 9/11 deceits


_______________

Idle thoughts of a relatively libertarian Republican in Cambridge, MA, and whomever he invites. Mostly political.


Powered by Blogger