|
|
|
|
|
Jens 'n' Frens
Idle thoughts of a relatively libertarian Republican in Cambridge, MA, and whomever he invites. Mostly political.
"A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures." -- Daniel Webster
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, February 07, 2003 :::
Kate Malcolm wants a definition of big government, and I guess I mean by it government that displaces a large portion of the private economy. That's the way I tend to think, is in terms of economics. (If Lily really does have a Richard Posner fan club, I wouldn't mind joining. I have a Calvin Coolidge fan club; appropriately, it doesn't actually do much. But I digress.) There's some difficulty, in the limit of small government, with determining what exactly that means, at least if we suppose that no government would mean chaos and the breakdown of the marketplace. (For thoughts on this, see a National Geographic article from last year on Somalia, where a fellow from a cell-phone company exults at how much easier it is to operate in an environment of anarchy than it was with the previous government.) I am fully confident that we are not near that limit.
I would warn against trying too much to distinguish between the government performing or ordering out for services that are governmental versus those that are, somehow, not; I certainly think of weapons development as a very governmental act — though I know a guy whose neighbor bought a Mig jet — while there are surely people who consider health care to be such a thing. (Either does displace — divert resources from — the private economy.) If the government could run health care exactly as is, perhaps subsuming it into the government does not really change the economy, but it certainly makes the government "bigger" in any sense in which it seems to me likely for someone to ordinarily use that word.
::: posted by dWj at 12:27 PM
|
|
|
|